Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> wrote:
> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > I think green was implying that sed would have its own getopt instead
> > of changing the system getopt.
>
> Ugh. Nasty. Especially if the modified getopt() could be useful to
> other programs as well (do we have any programs with options that take
> optional arguments?)
Okay, fine, assume we'd just do the same thing to the system's getopt()
instead of a special getopt(). So then...?
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\
<> green@FreeBSD.org <> bfeldman@tislabs.com \ The Power to Serve! \
Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message