* Bruce Evans <firstname.lastname@example.org> [020715 03:27] wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > Er, both size_t and off_t are pretty much the same one i386 and alpha...
> Actually, the are quite different.
size_t is 64 bits on alpha (versus 32 on i386), isn't it?
> > Also, casting enomem of line 257 of reverse.c doesn't fix this warning
> > which makes no sense...
> > Index: reverse.c
> > - warnx("warning: %qd bytes discarded", enomem);
> > + warnx("warning: %qd bytes discarded", (quad_t)enomem);
> This makes sense. %qd is just an alias for %lld, so it unsuitable for
> printing anything except long longs. Neither off_t nor quad_t is long
> long on alphas.
That's just obnoxious. :)
Any chance you can suggest how to clean this up? The fact that we
can't compile tail(1) without warnings bugs me.
-Alfred Perlstein [email@example.com]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message