On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> I *would* like to see the package versioning rules made more clear and
> explicit, and perhaps even see some reform. However, making up a new
> special case for `pl' seems right out.
> Has much discussion over PR 56961 taken place anywhere? I like it as a
> starting point.
Is anyone besides Oliver and myself interested in package version
number reform? I'd really like to produce a `better' set of rules
for the handbook that eliminates some of the edge cases, and then
re-version the relatively few ports that don't fit the rules.
Oliver's PR is as good a starting point as any that I've seen--- it
goes further than our current rules and only conflicts with them in
Jacques Vidrine / email@example.com / firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com