On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >>Also, could someone please get us more KTR ids while they're at it? We
> >>only have 2 left.
> > I think we should make one or to KTR_LOCAL's or something like that. So
> > you can have a define in your file for KTR_MYCODE 0, and when you want to
> > debug it, define it to KTR_LOCAL. There are a bunch of KTR ids that are
> > used for things that don't really need to be global that we could gc if we
> > do that.
> Isn't there a way to dynamically allocate ids, like sysctl does for oid?
They need to be static at compile time or they always produce massive
bloat in the kernel.