On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-12-05 15:20, Ceri Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:53:54PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> >> --- books/handbook/install/chapter.sgml 4 Dec 2006 14:43:50 -0000 1.338
> >> +++ books/handbook/install/chapter.sgml 5 Dec 2006 10:53:35 -0000
> >> @@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@
> >> <listitem>
> >> <para>The address block being used for this local area
> >> - network is a Class C block
> >> + network is a (historical) Class C block
> >> (<hostid role="ipaddr">192.168.0.0</hostid> -
> >> <hostid role="ipaddr">192.168.0.255</hostid>).
> >> The default netmask is for a Class C network
> > Any reason we can't get rid of the mention of "class C" in both cases
> > there? Something like:
> > The address block being used for this local area network is
> > 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0.
> Or even better:
> The address block being used for this local area network is
What is this new devilry!?
Seriously, I don't mind either way, but I don't know how much we assume
on the part of our users any more.
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.