> On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:06:58PM +0200, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > or package) or (if you don't fear RSA Inc) use the (superior)
> > International rsa_eay.c code.
> > 1.2 +2 -1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c
> > Log:
> > Merge from internat.freebsd.org repo, minus change to rsa_eay.c (missing)
> > Reorganize and unify libcrypto's interface so that the RSA implementation
> > is chosen at runtime via dlopen().
> Since it is not illegal for me (a USA-citizen in the USA) to have the
> "international" RSA code, why is it we don't have the full OpenSSL code
> in the Freefall repository? That way things are kept more in sync and
> on 21-Sept-2000 all I change is a symbol and I have the superior code.
Because it's illegal for you, a USA-citizen, to use the international
RSA code due to licensing (not export) laws.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message