Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssl/apps speed.c src/crypto/openssl/crypto/err err_all.c src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa rsa_stubs.c rsa.h rsa_eay.c rsa_lib.c src/crypto/openssl/rsaref rsar_err.c rsaref.c rsaref.h src/secure/lib Makefile src/secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile ...

> On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:06:58PM +0200, Peter Wemm wrote:
> >   or package) or (if you don't fear RSA Inc) use the (superior)
> >   International rsa_eay.c code.
> ...
> >   1.2       +2 -1      src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c
>
>
> > Log:
> >  Merge from internat.freebsd.org repo, minus change to rsa_eay.c (missing)
>
> >  Reorganize and unify libcrypto's interface so that the RSA implementation
> > is chosen at runtime via dlopen().
>
>
> Since it is not illegal for me (a USA-citizen in the USA) to have the
> "international" RSA code, why is it we don't have the full OpenSSL code
> in the Freefall repository?  That way things are kept more in sync and
> on 21-Sept-2000 all I change is a symbol and I have the superior code.
 
Because it's illegal for you, a USA-citizen, to use the international
RSA code due to licensing (not export) laws.
 
 
Nate
 
 
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message