Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/netscape4-communicator Makefile ports/japanese/netscape4-communicator/pkg PLIST ports/japanese/netscape47-communicator/pkg PLIST ports/korean/netscape4-communicator/pkg PLIST ports/korean/netscape4-navigator/pkg PLIST ports/korean/netscape47-communicator/pkg PLIST ...

[ Available lists | Index of cvs-all | Month of May 2000 | Week of 8 May 2000 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>
Date
8 May 2000 16:28:09
Subject
Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/netscape4-communicator Makefile ports/japanese/netscape4-communicator/pkg PLIST ports/japanese/netscape47-communicator/pkg PLIST ports/korean/netscape4-communicator/pkg PLIST ports/korean/netscape4-navigator/pkg PLIST ports/korean/netscape47-communicator/pkg PLIST ...
Message-ID
20000509001803.A25500@catkin.nothing-going-on.org


[ Hide this part ]
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 08:04:01AM +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote:
> > but in my experience with Netscape, it's too buggy to reliably let you
> > open lots of windows. If I have to look at a bunch of sites at a similar
> > time it makes more sense to open several copies of Netscape -- that way,
> > if one of them dies it doesn't take down all the other Netscapes with it.
>
> > IMHO, if a user runs a new netscape (as opposed to choosing "Navigator
> > Window" from the "File" menu) then they'll want a new Netscape process,
> > not just a new window.
>
> I understand the problem, but still you can raise another copy of
> netscape by executing `${PREFIX}/bin/netscape.run'. (Now I got the
> feeling that I should document it somewhere)

Yes. I'd prefer to see the defaults reversed as well. I mean, we don't
do this sort of thing for Emacs, which can behave the same way.

> Therefore I'd presume we could share an understanding that the issue
> comes down to which behavior should be the default, and that fitting
> our default behavior to that of MacOS, Windows and Linux wouldn't be a
> bad choice in this case.

How is it the default Linux behaviour? Does Netscape/linux not check
for the PID file, or is it just that RedHat and co. provide this sort of
wrapper as a default.

> Now many applications invoke `netscape' as the default HTML viewer,
> quicker display would be better for most people in most cases, IMHO.
>
> If you yet think there should be a way to change the default behavior,
> I'm willing to add a check of an environment variable or something to
> the wrapper. :-)

That would be a good idea.

N
--
Internet connection, $19.95 a month. Computer, $799.95. Modem, $149.95.
Telephone line, $24.95 a month. Software, free. USENET transmission,
hundreds if not thousands of dollars. Thinking before posting, priceless.
Somethings in life you can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard.
-- Graham Reed, in the Scary Devil Monastery


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Elapsed time: 0.143 seconds