Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile

[ Available lists | Index of cvs-src | Month of Sep 2003 | Week of 5 Sep 2003 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Date
5 Sep 2003 16:26:11
Subject
Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile
Message-ID
20030905162408.C90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz


[ Hide this part ]
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:

> Yes, you can. The agreement is reached when everybody accepts the
> outcome. This is unrelated to whether everybody likes the outcome.

I would argue that we're now discussing two different things....
consensus on the result, versus consensus on what the desired result is,
and the method(s) of achieving it. However, I won't quibble further.

> > Don't take this the wrong way, but with an attitude like that, how do
> > you get out of bed in the morning?
>
> Willpower, eased by the habit of getting out of bed in the afternoon.

LOL... touche.

> > The consensus was that we'd use
> > seperators for all NEW knobs, and go back and deal with the rest if time
> > allows.
>
> Yes, the first part of the sentence I remember. I can't recall the
> second part. If my memory is failing on me and we did in fact reach
> that consensus, then there's nothing to argue about. Otherwise we
> still need to get clear ruling on that last part.

As promised, I posted my bikeshed blueprints for this on -arch.

Doug

--

This .signature sanitized for your protection


Elapsed time: 0.222 seconds