Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>Also, could someone please get us more KTR ids while they're at it? We
>>only have 2 left.
> I think we should make one or to KTR_LOCAL's or something like that. So
> you can have a define in your file for KTR_MYCODE 0, and when you want to
> debug it, define it to KTR_LOCAL. There are a bunch of KTR ids that are
> used for things that don't really need to be global that we could gc if we
> do that.
Isn't there a way to dynamically allocate ids, like sysctl does for oid?