Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/include _types.h src/sys/i386/include _types.h src/sys/net if_bridge.c src/sys/netinet ip_var.h src/sys/netinet6 ip6_var.h

[ Available lists | Index of cvs-src | Month of Jul 2005 | Week of 4 Jul 2005 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Date
4 Jul 2005 09:53:28
Subject
Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/include _types.h src/sys/i386/include _types.h src/sys/net if_bridge.c src/sys/netinet ip_var.h src/sys/netinet6 ip6_var.h
Message-ID
20050704105721.Y2768@fledge.watson.org


[ Hide this part ]
 
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Peter Grehan wrote:

>> Check the alignment of the IP header before passing the packet up to the
>> packet filter. This would cause a panic on architectures that require
>> strict
>> alignment such as sparc64 (tier1) and ia64/ppc (tier2).
>
> FYI, any modern ppc implementation doesn't require strict alignment for
> integer load/stores though there's a performance penalty for having to
> split the access into smaller ones.

While it's not immediately relevant to the IP code, generally speaking, is
it the case that non-aligned integer reads can be non-atomic with respect
to other CPUs due to the multiple access implementation?

Robert N M Watson


Elapsed time: 0.104 seconds