Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays?

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-chat | Month of Sep 2003 | Week of 22 Sep 2003 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date
22 Sep 2003 09:33:28
Subject
Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays?
Message-ID
a06001a10bb94cf9154e1@[10.0.1.2]

In reply to
References to
Replies
Referenced by

[ Hide this part ]
At 10:50 AM -0400 2003/09/22, Marc Ramirez wrote:

> But after my Mavis Beacon diatribe the other day, I started feeling
> ancient :), and I'm wanting to install some sort of spam filter, which I
> know I'll have trouble integrating with pine. (It's amazing I haven't
> needed one yet.)
>
> So, what are you young hipsters using to read main and filter spam?

If you want a GUI MUA that incorporates anti-spam features, I
highly recommend Eudora 6. It also has a built-in spelling checker
(or uses the spelling check service provided by the OS), and many
other positive features. Eudora works well as either an IMAP or POP3
client.

On the CLI side, you can use SpamAssassin with procmail, and mutt
will work well (although pine would probably also work). If you're
doing anything related to PGP, I think mutt would be a better choice,
since it was designed (by Mike Elkins, the author of the PGP/MIME
RFC) to integrate those kinds of features from Day One. Mutt has
always worked well as a POP3 client, but used to have poor support
for IMAP. I don't know if that has since changed.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)


Elapsed time: 0.163 seconds