At 2:19 PM -0500 2004/03/11, Mike B wrote:
> I WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there.
This is a transition period. 4BSD took a long time to get where
it is today, and it's going to take a while to get ULE to the point
where it is always better than 4BSD. But we have to make the
cut-over somewhere, and we have to get people using it more widely.
If we don't, then ULE will never get to the point where it could be
as good as 4BSD, much less better.
This is -CURRENT. Things are expected to be a little strange
here, from time to time. This is just one of those things that's
going to take a little while to settle down.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)