> > /usr/ports with no distfiles is *small* - about 31MB for 810 ports
> > right now, which seems a very reasonable cost/benefit ratio to me.
> > Comments? Partially fermented fruit?
> Definitely. The tarball is much smaller than 31MB, 3.35MB as of 970304.
Well, yes, that's the gzip'd tarball. To be useful, however,
/usr/ports needs to be extracted and that's 31MB. ;)