On 2005-10-24 12:11, Maxim Konovalov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, 09:58+0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > While you're at it ...
> > I was going mad when trying to get a devfs.rules file working and
> > noticed the following typo in rc.subr
> > --- /etc/rc.subr Sun Oct 23 11:23:59 2005
> > +++ /etc/rc.subr.new Mon Oct 24 09:53:17 2005
> > @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@
> > }
> > # devfs_set_ruleset ruleset [dir]
> > -# Sets the default ruleset of dir to ruleset. The ruleset arguement
> > +# Sets the default ruleset of dir to ruleset. The ruleset argument
> > # must be a ruleset name as specified in devfs.rules(5) file.
> > # Returns non-zero if it could not set it successfully.
> > #
> Being non-native speaker I am not sure this is a error. There are
> about a dozen "arguement"s in our src tree and google gives 2.8
It's definitely a typo.