Re: HEADSUP usb2 (usb4bsd) to become default in 2 weeks.

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-current | Month of Dec 2008 | Week of 29 Dec 2008 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Date
29 Dec 2008 10:23:11
Subject
Re: HEADSUP usb2 (usb4bsd) to become default in 2 weeks.
Message-ID
200812291125.30222.hselasky@c2i.net


[ Hide this part ]
On Monday 29 December 2008, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes:
> > LIBUSB20_ADD_BYTES() is a hack to circumvent things like un-constifying
> > and making a byte increment to any pointer type. USB descriptors are
> > byte-packed. I have tested the macro with several kinds of compilers and
> > none have complained yet.
>
> 1) if you need to de-constify, your API is broken.

The following function is a candidate for de-constifying. You have a data
pointer there which is read or write, and to be able to transfer constant
data you need to do a deconst before passing the pointer to this function.

usb2_do_request_flags(struct usb2_device *udev, struct mtx *mtx,
struct usb2_device_request *req, void *data, uint32_t flags,
uint16_t *actlen, uint32_t timeout)

Deconstifying is not illegal in C using standard pointer arithmetics.
(void *)((const uint8_t *)(ptr) - (const uint8_t *)0)

>
> 2) just because the compiler doesn't know it's wrong doesn't mean it
> isn't.
>
> 3) the pointer magic you do in (for instance) libusb20_me_encode() and
> libusb20_me_decode() won't work on strict-alignment platforms.
>

Yes, it will, because all addresses are aligned before they get casted.

--HPS



Elapsed time: 0.102 seconds