John Hay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:27:04AM -0700, Li, Qing wrote:
>>> Li, Qing wrote:
>>>>> Me and many other people running net/mpd handling thousands of PtP
>>>>> interfaces sharing local addresses with each other and with some
>>>>> Ethernet interface. This change makes such setup inoperable, as mpd
>>>>> will constantly receive errors while trying to set addresses and
>>>>> drop connections.
>>>> I can revert to the old behavior. I asked for feedback and
>> received
>>>> none at the time ...
>>> I would like to see it working, but working correctly. If it is not
>>> possible to implement it correctly - then reverted, or at least
>>> disabled
>>> by default.
>>>
>> Asking for compatibility is reasonable but the existing packet
>> leaking behavior is incorrect.
>>
>> After reviewing the previous thread on this topic back in July,
>> I see that Henri Hennebert requested this feature for IPv6.
>>
>> I intend to introduce a sysctl variable to control whether loopback
>> route should be installed for the local end point. By default
>> the old behavior maintained.
>
> What about only adding the route if it does not exist yet? That should
> handle the common case of reusing your ip address on the ethernet
> interface on the local side of point-to-point links.
the hard part is removing it if it is the last interface that uses it.
>
> John