On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 19:00:31 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT!
> > Hello,
> > With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded
> > how much I hate the YYYY/MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that
> I guess & hope you mean you like linear decreasing order but
> dislike '/' as a delimeter & want to swap from '/' to '-' as in ISO ?
> > this almost looks like ISO 8601, but is an unreadable variant of it, I
> > would like to aggressively change this throughout the tree.
> > I'd like to start with minor stuff like share/misc/*.dot. Then probably
> > src/UPDATING, and ports/UPDATING after I've identified the consumers of
> > these docs.
> Do you mean you would like to swap eg src/UPDATING 20100720 to eg
> 2010-07-20 ? That would be more readable.
Yes, I think for lists of dates like in UPDATING or automatically
generated date output like syslogd, the ISO8601 format only has
> > The ultimate goal would be to change syslog's timestamp and ps(1)
> > output, but that goal is far off ...
> I've long had a mental note to get round to fixing isnd which emits:
> "05.01.2011 13:15:06"
> "2011-01-05 13:15:06"
Hehe, isdnd was written by a German, it seems :)
> However reading that URL, I see isdnd should have eg:
> But that 'T' is hard to see, so either space it (allowed by ISO)
> 2011-01-05 13:15:06
> 2011-01-05 13:15:06+01:00
> 2011-01-05 12:15:06Z
> or lower case the 't' (if ISO allows ?)
I'd prefer the space to "T" or "t" for easier human parsing (and for
machine parsing it doesn't really matter)
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
> > Uli
> Week numbers in ISO standard can (& should IMO) be ignored:
> Not much use for week numbers in FreeBSD,
> Dates when source code is released, & /var/logs get
> stamped etc, best without week numbers, just
> simplistic linearly progressive continuously
> decremental digit format (ie Year Month Day Hour
> Minute Second
> Week numbers not used much, eg
> I'm British, lived in Germany 25 years. First I
> ever saw of week numbers was in Germany, never saw
> them in Britain.
Outside of cal/ncal I don't think we use week numbers anywhere in
> Although default output of date eg
> Wed Jan 5 17:41:06 CET 2011
> is both non linear, & also non conformant in timezone (CET should
> be +01:00) it would open a can of worms to change default
> output, [unless it hangs on an env var.] ... [at least
> yet] ... too many shells use it (in user's own code, not
> just in /usr/src & /usr/ports).
> I don't see anything in `man date` to internaly emit timezone per ISO,
> this works:
> echo "`date -u +%Y-%m-%dt%H:%M:%S`Z"
> echo "`date -u +%Y-%m-%dt%H:%M:%S`+00:00"
> echo "`date -v-1H +%Y-%m-%dt%H:%M:%S`Z" # (as my TZ is -01:00)
> but as that wouldnt do if nested inside more quotes from other shells,
> we could add to date.c to emit an explicit timezone,
> 2 flags to add, I suggest:
> - '-U' to force '-u' & also swap output of eg "CET 2011" to
> "2011Z" or "2011+00:00" ( '-U' is not yet used ).
> - Some flag to specify a numeric string eg [+-][0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9]
> (... maybe tie that in with man environ TZ tzset ? )
It's too late to change anything in date(1)'s default output, and it has
%F already via strftime(3) so people like me can already use that