Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-current | Month of Jan 2011 | Week of 5 Jan 2011 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
Date
5 Jan 2011 23:58:40
Subject
Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree
Message-ID
4D250159.30108@quip.cz

In reply to

[ Hide this part ]
Ulrich Sprlein wrote:
> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 19:00:31 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>>> !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT!
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded
>>> how much I hate the YYYY/MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that
>>
>> I guess& hope you mean you like linear decreasing order but
>> dislike '/' as a delimeter& want to swap from '/' to '-' as in ISO ?
>
> Exactly.
>
>>> this almost looks like ISO 8601, but is an unreadable variant of it, I
>>> would like to aggressively change this throughout the tree.
>>>
>>> I'd like to start with minor stuff like share/misc/*.dot. Then probably
>>> src/UPDATING, and ports/UPDATING after I've identified the consumers of
>>> these docs.
>>
>> Do you mean you would like to swap eg src/UPDATING 20100720 to eg
>> 2010-07-20 ? That would be more readable.
>
> Yes, I think for lists of dates like in UPDATING or automatically
> generated date output like syslogd, the ISO8601 format only has
> advantages.

I am using ISO8601 date + time format for years in my scripts, logs
etc., so it would be nice to have it on all places of FreeBSD as a
standard format.
I think 2010-07-20 is really readable than 20100720 or 2010/07/20 and
"2011-01-06 00:03:50" is better than "Jan 6 00:03:50" (in logs)

+1

Miroslav Lachman


Elapsed time: 0.250 seconds