Re: AMI MegaRAID datapoint.

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-current | Month of Dec 1999 | Week of 17 Dec 1999 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca>
Date
17 Dec 1999 08:54:46
Subject
Re: AMI MegaRAID datapoint.
Message-ID
14426.27346.393029.804411@trooper.velocet.net

In reply to

[ Hide this part ]
>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> writes:

Brad> At 10:02 AM -0500 1999/12/17, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Well... it's RAID-5 across the same 8 drives with all 8 drives on
>> one LVD chain (same configuration as the other test). I have tried
>> the 128k stripe, but it was slower than the default 64k stripe.

Brad> One of the lessons I learned from Greg was that, when dealing
Brad> with RAID implementations in hardware, you should usually take
Brad> their "native" stripe size, since that's the one that will
Brad> usually perform best.

Brad> It's only when you do software RAID (e.g., vinum) that you can
Brad> choose larger or smaller stripe sizes with a reasonable
Brad> expectation that you will get the particular performance
Brad> enhancement that you're hoping for.

Another thing that I find very different betweent he vinum software
RAID-5 and the hardware I've tried (I've used both the DPT and the
MegaRAID controllers) that the latency of a command can be incredible
on the hardware raid. If you type (for instance) 'du -ks foo' where
foo is a big directory on the hardware raid, and then press CTRL-C, it
can take 10 to 15 seconds to come back (I'm assuming that this is
queued I/O requests).

Dave.

--
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be |
|Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they |
|http://www.velocet.net/~dgilbert | are precisely opposite. |
=========================================================GLO================


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Elapsed time: 0.214 seconds