Re: HARDWARE.TXT vs. {i386,alpha}/RELNOTES.TXT

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-doc | Month of Aug 2000 | Week of 31 Aug 2000 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
Date
31 Aug 2000 19:34:24
Subject
Re: HARDWARE.TXT vs. {i386,alpha}/RELNOTES.TXT
Message-ID
7m1yz4demv.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp

In reply to

[ Hide this part ]
At 31 Aug 2000 22:15:17 GMT,
Dan Moschuk <dan@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
> Why do we need an XML parser in the tree at all? Why not keep the XML file on
> freefall and regenerate/commit the handbook/HARDWARE.TXT everytime it is
> updated? A similar process (without the XML voodoo before hand) is done with
> src/UPDATING.

Right. At this stage, we can do that (keep XML files and Makefile in
doc repository and build them on freefall). But I think that method
is not "Right thing". In the future, CVS repository should include
*only* source file and machine generated file should be built by
${MAKE} on the fly.

On the other hand, same informations are stored in many places. Ftp
mirror sites are in www, handbook, sysinstall. Ports categories are
in www, porters-handbook, sysinstall, bsd.port.mk.

I think these data should be handled by more smart way and (IMHO) XML
has possibility to achive it. That's why I said we need light XML/XSL
tools in base system...


--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message



Elapsed time: 0.176 seconds