On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:50 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 02/03/2011 17:18 Michal Varga said the following:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:13 +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
> >> So instead of fixing things like these in ports, I'd say the issue
> >> should be reported/fix submitted to upstream, it's pretty much possible
> >> that they don't even know that there are systems that don't run evdev
> >> (note that I don't mean it offensively, more like speaking generally
> >> from experience, it simply happens).
> > Eh, I meant udev of course, I guess that's enough coffee for me today.
> That's possible, of course. Another possibility is that they think that
> everything is Linux, or everything is like Linux, or they don't care about not Linux.
> I am all for contacting them, for sure.
> Just want to point out that the proposed patch would not be against the nature of
> the ports, because it doesn't affect functionality, but addresses OS differences.
I was planning on submitted some of our pulse patchs upstream. I will
also submit this one as part of that.