Re: binary compatibility query

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-hackers | Month of May 2008 | Week of 10 May 2008 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org>
Date
10 May 2008 19:26:53
Subject
Re: binary compatibility query
Message-ID
20080510152718.788d638f@bhuda.mired.org

In reply to
Replies

[ Hide this part ]
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
> > anything exotic then you will "probably" be safe.
> For "raw" UNIX applications, this rule of thumb works well, but not for
> applications that depend on third-party libraries, languages, or daemons.

You can lose the dependency on third party libraries by compiling your
application to a static binary. That will also help with the few
breakages that occur with the system libraries, and with compatibility
across major releases using the backwards compatX packages.

<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.

O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org


Elapsed time: 0.157 seconds