On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, Donald J. Maddox wrote:
> It should be noted, however, that Ms. Poland is in _sales_, so the very
> idea of seeing anything based on LZS being distributed for free is very
> likely abhorrent to her :-) She is not a lawyer, so she may be completely
> wrong in her belief that anything at all based on LZS is covered by STAC's
> patents, but I'm not a lawyer, either, and can't afford to find out that
> she _was_ right in court.
It sounds like you might do well to acquire a different contact at that
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."