Re: http://www.dpt.com/os2.htm

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-hackers | Month of Mar 1998 | Week of 6 Mar 1998 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Date
6 Mar 1998 16:20:24
Subject
Re: http://www.dpt.com/os2.htm
Message-ID
3500906C.7566F4CF@whistle.com

References to

[ Hide this part ]
Tom wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > Justin T. Gibbs wrote:

> > > Last I looked at the DPT driver, it required the same software interrupt
> > > hooks that CAM required. I don't think that we can make these changes
> > > so close to the 2.2.6 release, but I will merge them in after 2.2.6 is
> > > cut.
> >
> > the DPT driver for 2.2 (which I have in my tree ready to commit)
> > supplies it's own software interrupt hooks which can be discarded when
> > the CAM stuff is merged in.
>
> That is what I thought.
>
> Can those hooks be conditionally compiled to reassure those how are
> skeptical about the DPT driver? At least the DPT driver can be shipped in
> 2.2.6 tree then.

I have done this..
I have checked in teh DPT driver into 2.2.x
all the CHANGES (as opposed to new files) are conditional on DPTOPT.
I thought it would be the safest way to do it so close to release time.
so you need to add
options DPTOPT to your config file as well as the
more usual
controller dpt0

the DPTOPT will go away after the release and when it's proven to work.


>
> Tom

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message


Elapsed time: 0.104 seconds