Re: MT-Safe wrapper around memcpy()?

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-hackers | Month of Oct 2001 | Week of 28 Oct 2001 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Date
28 Oct 2001 22:53:25
Subject
Re: MT-Safe wrapper around memcpy()?
Message-ID
20011029005316.W15052@elvis.mu.org

References to
Referenced by

[ Hide this part ]
* Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> [011029 00:43] wrote:
>
> I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper around memcpy()
> which can call fprintf() without winding up getting into a recursive
> loop. The problem is that fprintf() will call memcpy() and around and
> around we go.
>
> I can use a global variable to prevent this, but that usage isn't thread
> safe. I can make it thread safe by using pthread keys, but then i have to
> link in libc_r, and for non-pthreaded programs i don't want to do that.
>
> Anyone have any suggestions? Right now I'm almost thinking that I just
> need to directly patch libc and libc_r. It might be an ugly patch though,
> and I'd rather not have this patch mandate recompiling all of libc.

Where do you see mem* calling printf?

--
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Elapsed time: 0.339 seconds