Re: 2.1R vs 050196SNAP

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-isp | Month of May 1996 | Week of 22 May 1996 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Date
22 May 1996 10:50:30
Subject
Re: 2.1R vs 050196SNAP
Message-ID
199605221754.NAA26660@etinc.com


[ Hide this part ]
>Dennis shaped the electrons to the following form:
>:
>: Can anyone, in a nutshell please, give me a simple bullet list of the
>: most compelling reasons (excluding obscure device support) to
>: run the SNAP over 2.1R.
>:
> As an ISP you don't want to run a SNAP. But do go grab the -STABLE
>code! This has made a world of diffrence in uptime, gets you BSDI 2.0
>compatablity, and a much improved Adaptec driver. Likely more, but that's
>what was important to me.

Is anyone running our product in -stable?

Dennis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com

Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For
Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame
Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD
and LINUX



Elapsed time: 0.062 seconds