2010/12/28 Warner Losh <email@example.com>:
> On 12/28/2010 04:36, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Not interested?
>> Note this might become mandatory if you ever want to compile
>> code that uses TLS with recent GCC.
>> In any case, when executed natively, rdhwr is a speed-up
>> compared to a sysarch() call.
> Actually, am interested in this, but have been swamped with other things...
> The code looks good, and we should definitely move in this direction.
Thank you. So can it be committed, or does it need improvement
of some kind first?