Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-net | Month of Mar 2006 | Week of 20 Mar 2006 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Michael Vince <mv@roq.com>
Date
20 Mar 2006 05:44:36
Subject
Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit
Message-ID
441E413E.7090006@roq.com


[ Hide this part ]
I use netperf which is a pure network traffic tester I also just use
basic 'ab/apache' tests which would also test HD/IO if getting large files.
For the 'em' driver I have seen some posts/cvs commit updates to the
driver saying it now works better without polling then with polling. I
think this is in -stable but it might just be in current. I haven't done
any testing for a while.



OxY wrote:

> i changed sk to em.
> how could i measure speed or benchmark the network performance?
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
> <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
> To: "OxY" <oxy@field.hu>
> Cc: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit
>
>
>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, OxY wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>> Just on a hunch, can you try putting the card in a different PCI
>>>> slot? There may be interrupt routing issues.
>>>>
>>> okay, i will try it in a couple days
>>
>>
>> the card also has a sysctl for intr moderation. See man 4 sk. The
>> default changed with Pyun's updated driver, I think, but you could
>> play with that too.
>>
>> Further I still have the feeling that your measurings are not
>> comparable.
>>
>> --
>> Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Elapsed time: 0.219 seconds