Re: patch for IPSEC_NAT_T

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-net | Month of Oct 2006 | Week of 13 Oct 2006 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Joerg Pernfuss <elessar@bsdforen.de>
Date
13 Oct 2006 14:56:01
Subject
Re: patch for IPSEC_NAT_T
Message-ID
20061013165518.103236c8@loki.starkstrom.lan

In reply to
Referenced by

[ Hide this part ]
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> wrote:

> I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC
> / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn'
> define IPSEC_NAT_T.

Or it won't compile because some defines are missing, just like umass
breaks without scbus.

Joerg
--
| /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a |
| \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 |
| X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. |
| / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. |


[ Show this part (application/pgp-signature) ]

Elapsed time: 0.163 seconds