At 04:04 AM 6/29/2008, Paul wrote:
>This is just a question but who can get more than 400k pps
>forwarding performance ?
OK, I setup 2 boxes on either end of a RELENG_7 box from about May
7th just now, to see with 2 boxes blasting across it how it would
work. *However*, this is with no firewall loaded and, I must enable
ip fast forwarding. Without that enabled, the box just falls over.
even at 20Kpps, I start seeing all sorts of messages spewing to route
-n monitor
got message of size 96 on Mon Jun 30 15:39:10 2008
RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 96, pid: 0, seq 0, errno
0, flags:<DONE>
locks: inits:
sockaddrs: <DST>
default
I am starting to wonder if those messages are the results of
corrupted packets the machine just cant keep up with ?
CPU is
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3070 @ 2.66GHz (2660.01-MHz
686-class CPU)
input (Total) output
packets errs bytes packets errs bytes colls
611945 0 77892098 611955 0 77013002 0
616727 0 78215508 616742 0 77303454 0
617066 0 78162130 617082 0 77238434 0
618238 0 78302314 618225 0 77377582 0
617035 0 78141000 617038 0 77215672 0
617625 0 78225600 617588 0 77301734 0
616190 0 78017320 616165 0 77091774 0
615583 0 78064130 615628 0 77152800 0
617662 0 78254388 617658 0 77332340 0
618000 0 78269912 617950 0 77344554 0
617248 0 78183136 617315 0 77259588 0
617325 0 78204566 617289 0 77282094 0
618391 0 78337734 618357 0 77413756 0
616025 0 78116070 616082 0 77203116 0
To generate the packets, I am just using
/usr/src/tools/tools/netblast on 2 endpoints starting at about the same time
# ./netblast 10.10.1.2 500 100 40
start: 1214854131.083679919
finish: 1214854171.084668592
send calls: 20139141
send errors: 0
approx send rate: 503478
approx error rate: 0
# ./netblast 10.10.1.3 500 10 40
start: 1214854273.882202815
finish: 1214854313.882319031
send calls: 23354971
send errors: 18757223
approx send rate: 114943
approx error rate: 0
The box in the middle doing the forwarding
1[spare-r7]# ifconfig -u
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=19b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
ether 00:1b:21:08:32:a8
inet 10.20.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.20.1.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
ether 00:1b:21:08:32:a9
inet 192.168.43.193 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.43.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
em3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=19b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
ether 00:30:48:90:4c:ff
inet 10.10.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.1.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
I am going to try a few more tests with and without, firewall rules
etc as well as an updated kernel to RELENG_7 as of today and see how that goes.
---Mike