Re: Linux async vs. FreeBSD sync (fwd)

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-ports | Month of Aug 1996 | Week of 28 Aug 1996 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>
Date
28 Aug 1996 13:01:26
Subject
Re: Linux async vs. FreeBSD sync (fwd)
Message-ID
199608282000.NAA05510@server1.chromatic.com

In reply to
Referenced by

[ Hide this part ]
 
> > I've been using a private scheme doing precisely the same thing
> > (each application version to its own directory). This has the
> > enormous advantage of being able to upgrade/downgrade a single
> > application in a snap.
>
> I don't understand completely why you'd do this. If you want ispell in
> /usr/local/app/ispell/bin, then do the ports make as:
> make PREFIX=/usr/local/app/ispell
> and it would install there, unless it was an X11 application. The X11
> apps will probably do that too in a little while (watch this space!)

I have not been using ports yet, but I just finally finished setting up
a local archive for Chromatic internal use, so it will be a lot easier.

> Of course, your path statement would look like hell.

Nope. It will just be /usr/local/bin because, like the original
suggestion, I also symbolic link everything into /usr/local/bin (as well
as /usr/local/include, /usr/local/lib, /usr/local/lib/app-defaults, ...).

Ern




Elapsed time: 0.161 seconds