Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A15B1065672;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1B28FC14;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8TGEJKL058913;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:14:19 GMT
	(envelope-from dougb@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from dougb@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8TGEIu1058878;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:14:18 GMT (envelope-from dougb)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:14:18 GMT
Message-Id: <201109291614.p8TGEIu1058878@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: admin@lissyara.su, svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com, dougb@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, secteam@FreeBSD.org
From: dougb@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/160805: [update] lang/php52 CVE vulnerabilities fixes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:14:19 -0000

Synopsis: [update] lang/php52 CVE vulnerabilities fixes

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: dougb
State-Changed-When: Thu Sep 29 16:10:46 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 

secteam, please review and give an opinion as to whether this will clear the
vulnerabilities.

It's not clear to me why keeping 5.2 after its EOL is a feature, but if you
guys decide it's Ok to keep it with these patches I'm not opposed.

FYI, it's scheduled for deletion on 2011-10-14.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->secteam
Responsible-Changed-By: dougb
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Sep 29 16:10:46 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 

Security ... it's not just a job, it's an adventure.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160805