Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-questions | Month of Jun 2003 | Week of 15 Jun 2003 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply ]
From
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Date
15 Jun 2003 16:48:06
Subject
Re: more transparent proxy and squid questions.
Message-ID
3EED05B3.9000204@potentialtech.com

In reply to

[ Hide this part ]
Andrew Thomson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:47:09AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
>>Yes. You've got the right idea.
>
>
> hmm.. i have encountered some difficulties ;) so now i'm seeking some
> more advice..
>
> i have the following rules on my firewall:
>
> 10561 skipto 11000 ip from 192.168.1.2 to any
> 10562 fwd 192.168.1.2,3128 tcp from 192.168.1.3 to any 80
>
> keeping in line with my example, 1=fwall, 2=squid, 3=user
>
> the skipto is in there so we go through nat and get a proper ip.
>
> i never see any packets get to the squid box though..
>
> ipfw show indicates matching packets
> ipfw show 10561 10562
> 10561 5342 331306 skipto 11000 ip from 192.168.1.2 to any
> 10562 2520 120960 fwd 192.168.1.2,3128 tcp from 192.168.1.3 to any 80
>
> a tcpdump on the squid box looking out for port 3128 shows nothing, although
> the ipfw shows matches..
>
> i'll keep digging around but any more tips would be appreciated on this
> setup.

Someone else may have keener eyes, but for my part I can't guess what the problem
could be from your description.

Can you send your entire ipfw ruleset? (i.e. the complete output of 'ipfw show')
Perhaps then I'll be able to get a better idea what you're doing. If 10562 is
catching packets, then it's likely that it's somewhere else that the problem lie.

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com


Elapsed time: 0.322 seconds