On 2007-08-29 14:18, Eric Crist <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Aug 29, 2007, at 1:54 PMAug 29, 2007, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> On 2007-08-29 18:51, Wojciech Puchar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> fragment from my test program (used for other thing but doesn't matter)
>>> /sbin/ping -i 0.5 -s 1450 -c 3 tested_host >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
>>> if [ $? != 0 ];then
>> I'm not sure if '!=' is a 'portable' way to write sh(1) tests,
>> but you have a point there :-)
> AFAIK, the != is evaluated by test, not sh.
You're right. I did check with SUSv2 and SUSv3 after I posted the
previous message. The != operator is defined by both standards[1,2],
so I was wrong about its portability.
Thanks for the correction,