Re: SATAN ported??

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-questions | Month of Apr 1995 | Week of 4 Apr 1995 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
<bmk@dtr.com>
Date
4 Apr 1995 19:28:05
Subject
Re: SATAN ported??
Message-ID
199504050223.TAA21370@dtr.com


[ Hide this part ]
 
I'm going to have a go at porting perl5 tonight - I'll let everyone know
how it goes.

One thing bothers me. I can run SATAN locally to test my own network,
but I have no capability to run it remotely. The only other network
that I have sufficient access to is not very well connected (all access
to the Internet is via a 9600bps SLIP link on a proxy gateway - the
gateway doesn't have the resources to run it, and it'd be painfully slow
besides). I don't know how effective this tool will be running "on the
inside". The only other options I have for running it personally are on
systems with sysadmins that I do not fully trust.

I'd like to enlist the help of someone to probe my site - but for
obvious reasons, it must be someone trustworthy.

What's a sysadmin to do? :)

> we need to do that here too....

> let me know if your get it done..
> I can set it up on REF.tfs.com and we can use it as a service to beat on each
> other's systems :)

> >
> > "Sean McGee" <smmcgee@jasper.ncbc.edu> writes:
> > >So, who's going to port SATAN so that we have some kind of defense?
> >
> > Who has ported perl5? We must have that as a tool to make SATAN work.
> >
> > ----
> > Richard Wackerbarth
> > rkw@dataplex.net
> >
> >
> >



Elapsed time: 0.084 seconds