Tom Samplonius <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> SAS and 2.5in make a lot of sense for enterprise use. Storage density
> has increased a lot, so the extra density can be used to put more
> spindles in less space. Why use a 3.5in 10K 146GB disk, when you can
> use a 2.5in 10K 146GB disk? Imagine the space savings alone.
Not to mention many 15000/min drives have been using smaller disks than
their 10000/min counterparts anyways.