Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-stable | Month of May 2005 | Week of 25 May 2005 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Date
25 May 2005 22:37:23
Subject
Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)
Message-ID
20050525223811.GA58132@xor.obsecurity.org

In reply to
Replies
Referenced by

[ Hide this part ]
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:33:39PM -0700, Jon Dama wrote:
> Could this be quantified by setting up a synthetic experiement:
>
> 1) one machine uses dummynet to generate a uniform packet/sec stream
> 2) another machine has a process receiving those packets and recording
> their arrival relative to the local TSC. afaik, the TSC is the only
> source of wall-time that doesn't involve a system call. Is that right?
> Are the TSCs synchronized on SMP systems?
> 3) Generate another source of activity on the receiving machine to
> estimate the effect of PREEMPTION relative to the (lack of) quiescence.
> 4) use the jitter in the TSC deltas to infer the effect of preemption

That would be attempting to benchmark something entirely different.

Kris


[ Show this part (application/pgp-signature) ]

Elapsed time: 0.144 seconds