Re: Re: ATI SB600 Sata controler isn't detected as such.

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-stable | Month of Apr 2008 | Week of 17 Apr 2008 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>
Date
17 Apr 2008 11:15:57
Subject
Re: Re: ATI SB600 Sata controler isn't detected as such.
Message-ID
20080417111557.GA81115@eos.sc1.parodius.com

In reply to

[ Hide this part ]
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:14:12PM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
> Andrey V. Elsukov a crit :
>> 16.04.08, 19:28, "Arnaud Houdelette" <arnaud.houdelette@tzim.net>:
>>
>>
>>> Thanks for the info. The jumper may well be in place.
>>> Still it doesn't solve the main issue, that is the controler isn't
>>> properly recognised.
>>>
>>
>> <ATI (ID=43801002) AHCI controller> - it is ok.
>>
>> The generic AHCI was added some time ago. So if your controller is true
>> AHCI it will be detected in this way.
>> And now we don't need to add each new device id in the
>> driver.
>>
>> --
>> WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
>>
> I removed the jumpers, and drives are recognised as sata300.
> But I still get the "atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATADEVICES): Device not
> configured" message.

And this is on an `atacontrol list`? Hmm. It almost sounds like your
kernel is missing a device line or something, very odd. Please open a
PR on that, Soren or someone else should be able to fix it.

--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |



Elapsed time: 0.122 seconds