Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-stable | Month of Jun 2008 | Week of 5 Jun 2008 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply ]
From
Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
Date
5 Jun 2008 00:22:19
Subject
Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3
Message-ID
7B3DA577-61F6-41D2-90B1-954E3A5A5C80@netconsonance.com

In reply to
Replies
Referenced by

[ Hide this part ]
> Jo Rhett wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
>>> the 6.2 EoL; the expiry date has been advertised since the 6.2
>>> release itself.
>> It has changed multiple times. I keep reviewing and finding 6.3
>> bugs outstanding, and then observe the EoL get pushed.
>> I'm surprised that it failed to get pushed this time.
>
> I'm sorry that the FreeBSD project failed to conform to your
> expectations. However, I invite you to actually try 6.3 for
> yourself instead of assuming that it will fail.


Several of the bug reports have the *exact* same hardware we are
using. Rackable systems with 3ware controllers.

If you're asking why I don't turn a production environment over to
being a freebsd-unstable-testbed, I can't really answer that question
in a way you'd understand (if you were asking that question)

--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness




Elapsed time: 0.160 seconds