> > I'd say Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B without the blink of an eye. I
> > don't use it in 100MB mode (yet), but in 10MB it outperforms anything I
>
> Speaking of this, is there work in progress for support of the new Intel
> card that replaces the 10/100B--the Pro 100+? Intels page says that the
> new card is driver compatible--anyone using the new card?
Why would there need to be any work in progress at all, if they're
driver-compatible?
And for that matter, why would I be recommending the 100+ if we didn't
already support it?
--
\\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith
\\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au
\\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org
\\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message