More on the crashes already mentioned.

[ Available lists | Index of freebsd-stable | Month of Oct 1999 | Week of 4 Oct 1999 | Raw email | View thread | Wrap long lines | Reply | Tag ]
From
David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca>
Date
4 Oct 1999 13:42:57
Subject
More on the crashes already mentioned.
Message-ID
14329.4421.847994.918399@trooper.velocet.net


[ Hide this part ]
In reference to the two crash dumps I've posted, the most interesting
thing about them is that a non-debug kernel seems to be stable on the
box. I can't really explain why, but we tried all kinds of things ---
changing hardware... even exchanging whole guts of machines and those
two examples of crashes persisted.

Then in a fit of despairation, I recompiled the kernel w/o debug
symbols and so far (touch wood) the machine has been stable.

Now... the machine has 256M of memory ... so I wouldn't expect that
kernel size *should* be an issue, but something is not right here.

Dave.

--
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be |
|Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they |
|http://www.velocet.net/~dgilbert | are precisely opposite. |
=========================================================GLO================


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Elapsed time: 0.123 seconds