The tinderbox seems to think that this broke the build.
On 11/26/2010 07:35, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Author: attilio
> Date: Fri Nov 26 15:35:08 2010
> New Revision: 215868
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215868
> - Advertise when the reboot came from a watchdog-induced reset.
> - Fix a bug where TCO_BOOT_STS was supposed to be cleared after
> TCO_SECOND_TO_STS and not before.
> Sponsored by: Sandvine Incorporated
> Submitted by: Mark Johnston<mjohnston at sandvine dot com>
> Reviewed by: des
> MFC after: 10 days
> Modified: head/sys/dev/ichwd/ichwd.c
> --- head/sys/dev/ichwd/ichwd.c Fri Nov 26 15:33:09 2010 (r215867)
> +++ head/sys/dev/ichwd/ichwd.c Fri Nov 26 15:35:08 2010 (r215868)
> @@ -225,12 +225,12 @@ ichwd_sts_reset(struct ichwd_softc *sc)
> * by writing a 1, not a 0.
> ichwd_write_tco_2(sc, TCO1_STS, TCO_TIMEOUT);
> - /*
> - * XXX The datasheet says that TCO_SECOND_TO_STS must be cleared
> - * before TCO_BOOT_STS, not the other way around.
> + /*
> + * According to Intel's docs, clearing SECOND_TO_STS and BOOT_STS must
> + * be done in two separate operations.
> - ichwd_write_tco_2(sc, TCO2_STS, TCO_BOOT_STS);
> ichwd_write_tco_2(sc, TCO2_STS, TCO_SECOND_TO_STS);
> + ichwd_write_tco_2(sc, TCO2_STS, TCO_BOOT_STS);
> @@ -520,11 +520,12 @@ ichwd_attach(device_t dev)
> device_get_desc(dev), sc->ich_version);
> - * XXX we should check the status registers (specifically, the
> - * TCO_SECOND_TO_STS bit in the TCO2_STS register) to see if we
> - * just came back from a watchdog-induced reset, and let the user
> - * know.
> + * Determine if we are coming up after a watchdog-induced reset.
> + * This bit is cleared in ichwd_sts_reset().
> + if ((ich_read_tco_2(sc, TCO2_STS)& TCO_SECOND_TO_STS) != 0)
> + device_printf(dev,
> + "resuming after hardware watchdog timeout\n");
> /* reset the watchdog status registers */
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/